I have two ideas and I really like both of them.
One is based of the idea of the jungle being a playground and if you don't know the rules, you will lose the game. The other is based of giving second chances like Zaroff gave Rainsford while hiding in the jungle.
Thesis Statement 1: By relating Richard Connell's "The Most Dangerous Game" to a cultural aspect of life, one can see that being allowed to have a second chance changes a person's knowing prospective of life entirely by seeing their mistakes and knowing that they have the chance to fix them.
Thesis Statement 2: Richard Connell's "The Most Dangerous" relates to real life situations of the battle of the fittest, where you have to know the rules, even in a jungle, or end up losing.
Richard Connell's "The Most Dangerous Game" demonstrates Charles Darwin's survival of the fittest, where Rainsford had to know the rules of the General Zaroff's game, or end up losing.
ReplyDelete